If all you learn here is 8 inches per mile squared, you pass.

Please download this graphic. This math is easy to confirm.

Since this curvature cannot be found on earth, we are left to assume the earth is flat. Default is flat because that’s what you see and anything else is a belief system that doesn’t apply to reality when it must. The curvature over water has to be 8 inches per square mile, no more or less. If you end up measuring less over water, the size of the entire earth has to change at the equator and since it’s a ball — it has to change longitudinally as well making earth impossibly large based upon the actual measurements that you do on this plane of existence.

I’m measuring light 10 to 20,000 miles away with HOW TO TELL TIME BY THE MOON but if you can come up with 10 miles to measure across water, you can figure this out since the curvature should be 66.66 feet — which is a substantial height/depth; most towns don’t even have a structure that tall. If your zoom isn’t great it will be sunk into the horizon but the zoom can bring it right into focus.

You can see me argue these points here

1st Geekroom Debate

This was a cakewalk, I wonder if Louis is a flat earther yet.

2nd Geekroom Debate

Red’s Rhetoric is just that… rhetoric to no end and no evidence. This poor Sith Lord should be in your prayers. He loses every debate but he says he’s a rocket scientist.

The Infamous "Blue Marble"

Would the only image of earth from space from 1972 to 2005 have “sex” painted into the clouds west of Madagascar if it were real? WOULD IT???

The new ones are just as bad, time lapses without clouds moving, no sun, no moon, no stars.

When's the ball earth coming out?

These goofballs have had 500 years to show you a model that falls apart the first time you pay attention to ANY detail.

Polaris. Allegedly spinning,(1,039 mph at the equator,) falling around the sun at a satanic 66,000 mph, whilst our solar system as a whole falls around the center of the milky way galaxy, (whatever that is,) at a cool half million mph. Not to neglect the ‘fact’ that our axis is tilted at 23.4 degrees of tilt, (if you subtract that from 90 degrees you get 66.6 degrees—believable?) None of this is even detectable and it somehow doesn’t change our view of the north star. It’s already irreconcilable but I’ll go on.

Look at the moon that allegedly barely moves all night, overhead for weeks falling into the earth; just barely missing us in this perpetual dance that hasn’t been affected by the sun’s “gravity” for however many billions of years and yet it’s just barely moving. Meanwhile, we’re only 6 times the “gravity” of the moon but 81 times more massive. We zip right around the sun once per day.

They’ve manufactured a plethora of false proofs such as boats disappearing from the bottom, Drains flow one way on top of the ball and the other way on the bottom (they even claimed snipers have to take this into account but somehow hot-air balloons rise, stay aloft for hours, and descend to the same place), the Antarctic 24 hour sun. All manufactured and demonstrably so by anyone, (besides the outer ring of Antarctica since it’s illegal to explore there.)

What does a rocket push against in space? Nothing. Rockets don’t work in a vacuum. Space is a more powerful vacuum than mankind can create.Vacuum meeting the non-vacuum of the earth? It defies all observable physics.

Everyone can tell time by the sun, right? Now that I know what’s going on, I can tell time by the moon in the same way– with the same degree of accuracy; can you do that with all your space ‘knowledge’?

Gyroscopes maintain level orientation regardless of external forces such as the mythical gravity which cannot be observed from anywhere but space –a magical invisible land that makes your senses dumb and wrong about everything. Planes will fly 1,000s of miles without leaving the same level plane they took off from. Flat earth is proven by the gyroscopes in every single plane on every trip.

We have jets that go the speed of sound 767 mph. Using the curvature formula, 8” per mile squared—a jet at Mach 1 would have to drop 74 miles the first hour — incrementally. A jet traveling Mach 2 would need to drop 297 miles incrementally after one hour. In March 2004, the X-43A set the previous record of Mach 6.8 (nearly 5,000 mph). That means that after one hour, it would need to drop 4,000 miles incrementally, (the radius of earth). Since then NASA has been working towards Mach 10 with this craft, that’s 7,670 mph which necessitates 7,427 miles of drop after one hour. That’s a drop of 124 miles per minute (avg isn’t an accurate depiction because there is a quicker decline the further from your home airports level that you set your gyroscope with.) or over 2 miles a second. Drop is the appropriate word because it cannot be achieved by angling alone. Instrumentation — altimeters and gyroscopes – register none of this. Considering we aren’t terribly sure what’s up above 120,000 feet or 25 miles, the numbers don’t add up even if we consider twice that distance claimed for NASA’s X series.

Gravity doesn’t exist and you can’t even show it in a test. Magnetism and thus buoyancy/relative density describe everything we ever see moving up or down. It can be reproduced and you can take a picture to show the relative densities of dozens of fluids, solids, and gasses which are all determined by magnetism. Magnetism/resistances of the air strata is measured and assigned the label ‘gravitational constant’ but it is the air’s viscosity that accounts for all natural acceleration. If dolphins made a gravitational constant it would be a measure of waters viscosity instead of air.

This is just measuring the viscosity and other variables against electromagnetism, (which we’re sure exists) applying it to our atmosphere and calling it gravity.

Objects accelerate through the air, (a fluid,) towards their equilibrium, (or earth if you are reaching it from the sky and the waters surface if approaching from below). If you take an even thinner fluid than air, such as helium, it accelerates upward through the air. Air bubbles accelerate upward through the water. If you have a fluid, you’re going to have acceleration through it based on viscosity, mass, displacement, etc That boils down to buoyancy vs drag; if the buoyancy is higher than the drag, it accelerates. The object still experiences acceleration whether headed up or down. When that acceleration reduces to nothing, it’s because it’s at buoyant equilibrium (or 2nd law of thermodynamics).

The curve is not over the water, nor the land. 8 inches per mile squared. You will never see something 30 miles across the water because it should be hidden by 600 feet of curvature. The problem being: you can see that far and further. Water is 71% of the world. Since water doesn’t curve, the earth is flat.

The tiny solar eclipse shadow CANNOT be negotiated any other way; It proves a small moon.

Any lunar eclipse where the shadow comes from the side disprove the helios model

The sun doesn’t behave like an explosion.

…on a side note.

Goofy flight paths in the Southern Hemisflat. Emergency stops and unusual connections are enough evidence to demand better proof for claims. Missing plane crashes in the south; this, to me, is a smoking gun. Flat out, how can we have satellites, GPS, and black box transponders but not find a modern jet? A plane wreckage would be luggage,black-box transponder, seats, debris scattered across miles but they can’t find planes sometimes?

There is only one earth and it’s flat. No flat earther has ever gone back to believing they live on a spinning ball; it’s impossible. Every geocentrist today was a heliocentrist and then we got better. Research can only lead to the one truth. It’s like Santa; once someone spills the beans you know forever that Santa isn’t real. If you ask the other kids at school whether or not Santa is real, they’ll all testify to the fact that he is real. Some of them may even produce evidence, which they’ll claim as proof–“Santa gave me this backpack last year”. You know that he isn’t real though and say as much. This causes some of the other kids to stop talking to you and others actually get mad. You know now and that knowledge protects you from their testimonies and their circumstantial evidence for all time. Now, figure out how to go back to believing in a fat man that breaks into everyone’s house to give them presents once a year and let me know. Don’t forget, The National Aeronautics Space Administration, Santa, and Satan are anagrams.

When is the globe coming out? When I was a kid Santa lived in the north pole, now it’s an ocean. The images we get from the ISS are clearly as bogus as possible. We have different size continents, an inability to film anything of interest to the people like Earth from space. If they do film something it will contain proof that it’s fake either by use of green screen/CGI boards/harnesses/and any Spacewalks are underwater so you can see bubbles escaping and divers dressed in black and poorly live edited out. The divers hand the actor-nots stuff and position them. Zero-G can only be simulated using parabolic maneuvers in a jet.

If we employ Occam’s razor to witness accounts of the ISS, it seems more likely that someone is witnessing a plane, which we know exist. This video was published 11 years ago, the same amount of time taken from 1945 to the first satellite so what do they have now? It’s even named Helios…after the sun God that rides a flaming chariot around the sky.

This is what the horizon does

Magellanic bridge

Gas pockets in strings, light-months across, in a vacuum, that never dissipate and are not affected by “gravity” in the slightest.

Vacuum meeting the non-vacuum of the earth. 2nd law of thermodynamics.

Space is imaginary. Money makes the world go round.

Still no answer

The most important thing to note here is that there is no answer to any of this. We’re collectively 3 years on this and nobody can defeat ANY of the facts of the flat earth. Not your Hawking’s, Neil Tyson’s, Micho Kaku’s. Can you?

All the evidence you need to admit there's a problem now?

If not, I’ve got many more. Have you ever wondered how the flat earth hasn’t gotten out? Come to find out, you can actually tell someone it’s flat, prove it’s flat, disprove Nasa the Star Trekkers and they’ll still think they live on a ball! That’s what happens when millions of people now know it’s flat and understand the concept of lying. Imagine five years ago when we were ALL in a space fantasy novel– just how hard it would have been to grasp it.

What you should be able to prove if the ball were real.

Gravity

Gravity should cause a change in the vector with lateral movement. It doesn’t. Not in planes, nor any instrument. Gravity doesn’t exist and cannot be displayed or measured.

If you could prove gravity, it would be with curve, instrumentation, and spin.

Curve

Curve – Anything from the agencies you deem legitimate that isn’t easily identified as fraud to you. Balloon footage. Long range photography. Any photography with non-fisheye lenses.

Instrumentation

Gyroscopes should be able to prove gravity.

Theodolites and other visual methods are great too. Make sure to use zoom tech though.

Radio transmitter tests.

Spin

Prove that the same factor affecting bullets, supposedly — the Coriolis force, also affects hot-air balloons or anything else free of the earth’s surface.

You don’t need me to figure this out. If someone could prove this ball exists, they would have.

If you need more

There’s been so much work on this with 100% precision that’s been reviewed by millions already that there is very little point in repeating it. The only evidence in existence is flat earth evidence and proof. This is more spiritual than scientific because scientifically, THERE IS NO REASON TO BELIEVE IN THE SPINNING BALL EARTH FLYING THROUGH A VACUUM.